VELARU MANDATE EXHIBIT PACK — ALGORITHMIC PRICE DISCRIMINATION Jurisdiction: European Union (eu) Modality: Text / Chat Program: Velaru Algorithmic Price Discrimination · European Union (galactic_price_discrimination_eu) Product ID: price_discrimination:eu:bundle:text Vertical: price_discrimination Generated: 2026-08-23T02:18:36.350786Z Authority: EU AI Act Conformity Pack — Algorithmic Pricing Fairness Pack Deadline: FTC algorithmic pricing scrutiny + EU Annex III Velaru verify: https://velaru-erra.onrender.com/verify EXHIBIT A — AI INVENTORY [] EXHIBIT B — GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK { "framework": "Velaru Mandate Registry \u2014 Algorithmic Price Discrimination", "exhibit_authority": "EU AI Act Conformity Pack \u2014 Algorithmic Pricing Fairness Pack", "regulatory_frameworks": [ "FTC Section 5", "Robinson-Patman Act", "EU AI Act Annex III", "State price gouging statutes", "CFPB UDAAP", "EU AI Act 2024/1689", "GDPR Art 22", "Product Liability Directive" ], "standards_alignment": [ "POSS-2", "DRP-1", "TCB", "FRE 707 pre-compliance", "ISO 42001" ], "human_oversight": "set dynamic price", "third_party_verification": "https://velaru-erra.onrender.com/verify (operator-independent)", "data_lineage": "Hash-chained Ed25519 receipts; optional RFC3161 + external anchor", "mirror_trap": "Insurer uses AI pricing \u2014 state DOI asks for rate filing support \u2014 receipt beats actuarial memo. \u00b7 Annex III high-risk list covers 8 domains \u2014 one vertical per domain minimum for compliance.", "chain_integrity": { "depth": 6, "invariant_holds": true } } EXHIBIT D — DATA INPUTS & VALIDATION { "data_validation_method": "Cryptographic receipt per AI decision; public verify without trusting deployer, vendor, or Velaru operator", "bias_testing_proxy": "Asymmetry score from live chain signals", "model_change_control": "Policy lock registry \u2014 criteria hash frozen pre-dispute", "logging_retention": "90-day pre-dispute window minimum; permanent verify permalinks", "external_validator": "Nisaba LLC / Velaru", "validator_independence": "Client-side Ed25519 verify; BYOK tri-receipt optional", "headline_stat": "FTC v. Amazon pricing algorithm \u2014 prove price at decision time or treble damages", "global_leaders_addressed": [ "FTC", "Amazon", "Progressive", "EU Commission", "State AGs", "EU AI Office", "EDPB", "European Parliament" ] } MIRROR TRAP (regulatory insight) Insurer uses AI pricing — state DOI asks for rate filing support — receipt beats actuarial memo. · Annex III high-risk list covers 8 domains — one vertical per domain minimum for compliance. NERVE CARDS — WHY GLOBAL LEADERS CARE [ { "title": "ZIP proxy", "body": "Same redlining logic as tenant screening applied to insurance pricing.", "source": "vertical" }, { "title": "CFPB UDAAP", "body": "Unfair pricing to protected class \u2014 AI without audit = strict liability inference.", "source": "vertical" }, { "title": "EU Art 5", "body": "Prohibited manipulation of vulnerable consumers through AI pricing.", "source": "vertical" }, { "title": "[European Union] FRIA requirement", "body": "Fundamental rights impact assessment for public/high-risk \u2014 exhibit pack maps to FRIA.", "source": "jurisdiction" }, { "title": "[European Union] PLD strict liability", "body": "Dec 2026 product liability directive \u2014 software and AI explicitly included.", "source": "jurisdiction" }, { "title": "[Text / Chat] Modality hook", "body": "Baseline \u2014 all frameworks apply to text decisions.", "source": "modality" } ] BOOK SUMMARY: { "total_insureds": 0, "compliant": 0, "grace_period": 0, "non_compliant": 0, "expired": 0, "not_enrolled": 0, "compliant_pct": 0.0 } TAM / EXPOSURE: Dynamic pricing everywhere · Robinson-Patman revival debate INSURANCE LINES: E&O, Class action defense, D&O DISCLAIMER: External validation evidence pack — not legal advice, not filed rate approval.