VELARU MANDATE EXHIBIT PACK — AI MODEL SUPPLY CHAIN PROVENANCE
Jurisdiction: Japan (jp)
Modality: Text / Chat
Program: Velaru AI Model Supply Chain Provenance · Japan (galactic_model_provenance_jp)
Product ID: model_provenance:jp:bundle:text
Vertical: model_provenance
Generated: 2026-08-19T14:50:00.738994Z
Authority: Japan METI AI Pack — GPAI Model Supply Chain Pack
Deadline: METI AI Guidelines 2024 + APPI
Velaru verify: https://velaru-erra.onrender.com/verify

EXHIBIT A — AI INVENTORY
[]

EXHIBIT B — GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK
{
  "framework": "Velaru Mandate Registry \u2014 AI Model Supply Chain Provenance",
  "exhibit_authority": "Japan METI AI Pack \u2014 GPAI Model Supply Chain Pack",
  "regulatory_frameworks": [
    "EU AI Act Article 53",
    "NTIA AI Accountability",
    "METI AI Guidelines",
    "APPI",
    "FSA AI governance"
  ],
  "standards_alignment": [
    "POSS-2",
    "DRP-1",
    "TCB",
    "FRE 707 pre-compliance",
    "ISO 42001"
  ],
  "human_oversight": "release model version",
  "third_party_verification": "https://velaru-erra.onrender.com/verify (operator-independent)",
  "data_lineage": "Hash-chained Ed25519 receipts; optional RFC3161 + external anchor",
  "mirror_trap": "Downstream deployer fined for upstream model change \u2014 receipt chain links provider to deployer. \u00b7 Japan soft-law approach hardening \u2014 FSA now expects bank AI documentation like BaFin.",
  "chain_integrity": {
    "depth": 4,
    "invariant_holds": true
  }
}

EXHIBIT D — DATA INPUTS & VALIDATION
{
  "data_validation_method": "Cryptographic receipt per AI decision; public verify without trusting deployer, vendor, or Velaru operator",
  "bias_testing_proxy": "Asymmetry score from live chain signals",
  "model_change_control": "Policy lock registry \u2014 criteria hash frozen pre-dispute",
  "logging_retention": "90-day pre-dispute window minimum; permanent verify permalinks",
  "external_validator": "Nisaba LLC / Velaru",
  "validator_independence": "Client-side Ed25519 verify; BYOK tri-receipt optional",
  "headline_stat": "Systemic risk GPAI \u2014 EU requires model evaluation documentation + incident reporting",
  "global_leaders_addressed": [
    "EU AI Office",
    "Hugging Face",
    "Meta AI",
    "Mistral",
    "NTIA",
    "METI",
    "SoftBank",
    "Toyota"
  ]
}

MIRROR TRAP (regulatory insight)
Downstream deployer fined for upstream model change — receipt chain links provider to deployer. · Japan soft-law approach hardening — FSA now expects bank AI documentation like BaFin.

NERVE CARDS — WHY GLOBAL LEADERS CARE
[
  {
    "title": "Art 53",
    "body": "GPAI provider obligations \u2014 technical documentation includes decision logging architecture.",
    "source": "vertical"
  },
  {
    "title": "NTIA AI Accountability",
    "body": "US parallel \u2014 dual compliance with one receipt primitive.",
    "source": "vertical"
  },
  {
    "title": "Supply chain",
    "body": "Fine-tuned model inherits base model liability \u2014 chain of receipts required.",
    "source": "vertical"
  },
  {
    "title": "[Japan] Aging society",
    "body": "Japan healthcare AI urgency \u2014 receipt for elder care and nursing decisions.",
    "source": "jurisdiction"
  },
  {
    "title": "[Japan] Automotive",
    "body": "Toyota/Honda AV \u2014 NHTSA equivalent documentation for JAMA standards.",
    "source": "jurisdiction"
  },
  {
    "title": "[Text / Chat] Modality hook",
    "body": "Baseline \u2014 all frameworks apply to text decisions.",
    "source": "modality"
  }
]

BOOK SUMMARY: {
  "total_insureds": 0,
  "compliant": 0,
  "grace_period": 0,
  "non_compliant": 0,
  "expired": 0,
  "not_enrolled": 0,
  "compliant_pct": 0.0
}

TAM / EXPOSURE: GPAI providers · Art 53 applies from Aug 2025
INSURANCE LINES: E&O, IP defense, Cyber

DISCLAIMER: External validation evidence pack — not legal advice, not filed rate approval.