VELARU MANDATE EXHIBIT PACK — LEGAL / LAW FIRMS Jurisdiction: Florida (us_fl) Modality: Text / Chat Program: Velaru Legal / Law Firms · Florida (galactic_legal_us_fl) Product ID: legal:us_fl:bundle:text Vertical: legal Generated: 2026-08-21T16:23:08.943533Z Authority: Florida OIR AI Pack — Legal AI Competence + Rule 1.1 Pack Deadline: ABA AI ethics opinions enforcement Velaru verify: https://velaru-erra.onrender.com/verify EXHIBIT A — AI INVENTORY [] EXHIBIT B — GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK { "framework": "Velaru Mandate Registry \u2014 Legal / Law Firms", "exhibit_authority": "Florida OIR AI Pack \u2014 Legal AI Competence + Rule 1.1 Pack", "regulatory_frameworks": [ "ABA Model Rule 1.6", "ABA Model Rule 5.5", "Fed R Evid 502", "FL HB 919", "Florida Information Protection Act", "Citizens Property Insurance" ], "standards_alignment": [ "POSS-2", "DRP-1", "TCB", "FRE 707 pre-compliance", "ISO 42001" ], "human_oversight": "file document citing AI research", "third_party_verification": "https://velaru-erra.onrender.com/verify (operator-independent)", "data_lineage": "Hash-chained Ed25519 receipts; optional RFC3161 + external anchor", "mirror_trap": "Law firm uses AI for brief \u2014 firm owns malpractice, vendor owns ToS. Receipt proves human review occurred. \u00b7 Florida property insurers using AI for claims while Citizens backs up market \u2014 AI claim denial = political lightning rod.", "chain_integrity": { "depth": 5, "invariant_holds": true } } EXHIBIT D — DATA INPUTS & VALIDATION { "data_validation_method": "Cryptographic receipt per AI decision; public verify without trusting deployer, vendor, or Velaru operator", "bias_testing_proxy": "Asymmetry score from live chain signals", "model_change_control": "Policy lock registry \u2014 criteria hash frozen pre-dispute", "logging_retention": "90-day pre-dispute window minimum; permanent verify permalinks", "external_validator": "Nisaba LLC / Velaru", "validator_independence": "Client-side Ed25519 verify; BYOK tri-receipt optional", "headline_stat": "Rule 1.1 competence includes AI \u2014 hallucinated citation = malpractice per se pattern", "global_leaders_addressed": [ "Clio", "Harvey AI", "ABA", "State bars", "DOJ", "Florida OIR", "Citizens Property", "Universal Property" ] } MIRROR TRAP (regulatory insight) Law firm uses AI for brief — firm owns malpractice, vendor owns ToS. Receipt proves human review occurred. · Florida property insurers using AI for claims while Citizens backs up market — AI claim denial = political lightning rod. NERVE CARDS — WHY GLOBAL LEADERS CARE [ { "title": "Hallucinated citations", "body": "Mata v. Avianca established sanctions \u2014 receipt of human verification step required.", "source": "vertical" }, { "title": "Rule 5.5 UPL", "body": "AI giving legal advice to consumers \u2014 platform liability without receipt chain.", "source": "vertical" }, { "title": "Malpractice insurers", "body": "LPL carriers adding AI exclusions \u2014 affirmative coverage needs proof infrastructure.", "source": "vertical" }, { "title": "[Florida] Hurricane claims AI", "body": "Post-Idalia/Ian claims AI scrutiny \u2014 bad faith with AI lowball estimate.", "source": "jurisdiction" }, { "title": "[Florida] Surplus lines", "body": "Florida largest homeowners market collapse \u2014 AI underwriting receipt mandatory for OIR exam.", "source": "jurisdiction" }, { "title": "[Text / Chat] Modality hook", "body": "Baseline \u2014 all frameworks apply to text decisions.", "source": "modality" } ] BOOK SUMMARY: { "total_insureds": 0, "compliant": 0, "grace_period": 0, "non_compliant": 0, "expired": 0, "not_enrolled": 0, "compliant_pct": 0.0 } TAM / EXPOSURE: $50B+ legal tech · malpractice insurers tightening AI exclusions INSURANCE LINES: Legal malpractice, Cyber DISCLAIMER: External validation evidence pack — not legal advice, not filed rate approval.