VELARU MANDATE EXHIBIT PACK — JUDICIAL SENTENCING / PAROLE Jurisdiction: China (cn) Modality: Text / Chat Program: Velaru Judicial Sentencing / Parole · China (galactic_judicial_cn) Product ID: judicial:cn:bundle:text Vertical: judicial Generated: 2026-08-20T05:46:44.895976Z Authority: China CAC Algorithm Filing Pack — Due Process Algorithmic Sentencing Pack Deadline: CAC algorithm filing + PIPL Velaru verify: https://velaru-erra.onrender.com/verify EXHIBIT A — AI INVENTORY [] EXHIBIT B — GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK { "framework": "Velaru Mandate Registry \u2014 Judicial Sentencing / Parole", "exhibit_authority": "China CAC Algorithm Filing Pack \u2014 Due Process Algorithmic Sentencing Pack", "regulatory_frameworks": [ "Due Process Clause", "Equal Protection Clause", "EU AI Act Annex III", "CAC Generative AI Measures", "PIPL", "DSL", "Algorithm Recommendation Rules" ], "standards_alignment": [ "POSS-2", "DRP-1", "TCB", "FRE 707 pre-compliance", "ISO 42001" ], "human_oversight": "apply risk score to defendant", "third_party_verification": "https://velaru-erra.onrender.com/verify (operator-independent)", "data_lineage": "Hash-chained Ed25519 receipts; optional RFC3161 + external anchor", "mirror_trap": "Courts demanding AI transparency while vendors claim trade secret \u2014 cryptographic receipt resolves impasse. \u00b7 Algorithm filing requires decision logic documentation \u2014 independent verify acceptable to CAC review.", "chain_integrity": { "depth": 4, "invariant_holds": true } } EXHIBIT D — DATA INPUTS & VALIDATION { "data_validation_method": "Cryptographic receipt per AI decision; public verify without trusting deployer, vendor, or Velaru operator", "bias_testing_proxy": "Asymmetry score from live chain signals", "model_change_control": "Policy lock registry \u2014 criteria hash frozen pre-dispute", "logging_retention": "90-day pre-dispute window minimum; permanent verify permalinks", "external_validator": "Nisaba LLC / Velaru", "validator_independence": "Client-side Ed25519 verify; BYOK tri-receipt optional", "headline_stat": "Algorithmic sentencing discovery requires independent verify \u2014 not vendor PDF", "global_leaders_addressed": [ "EU Commission", "ACLU", "COMPAS vendors", "State court admins", "CAC", "Tencent", "Alibaba", "ByteDance" ] } MIRROR TRAP (regulatory insight) Courts demanding AI transparency while vendors claim trade secret — cryptographic receipt resolves impasse. · Algorithm filing requires decision logic documentation — independent verify acceptable to CAC review. NERVE CARDS — WHY GLOBAL LEADERS CARE [ { "title": "COMPAS legacy", "body": "Wisconsin required disclosure \u2014 Velaru makes disclosure independently verifiable.", "source": "vertical" }, { "title": "EU Art 14 oversight", "body": "Human oversight must be documented \u2014 not asserted in policy manual.", "source": "vertical" }, { "title": "Municipal D&O", "body": "County buys risk assessment AI \u2014 county executives personally named in civil rights suits.", "source": "vertical" }, { "title": "[China] Dual compliance", "body": "Multinationals operating CN + US/EU \u2014 one architecture, jurisdiction-tagged receipts.", "source": "jurisdiction" }, { "title": "[China] DeepSeek moment", "body": "Chinese model deployment globally \u2014 provenance receipt links model to decision.", "source": "jurisdiction" }, { "title": "[Text / Chat] Modality hook", "body": "Baseline \u2014 all frameworks apply to text decisions.", "source": "modality" } ] BOOK SUMMARY: { "total_insureds": 0, "compliant": 0, "grace_period": 0, "non_compliant": 0, "expired": 0, "not_enrolled": 0, "compliant_pct": 0.0 } TAM / EXPOSURE: Govtech sentencing tools · Loomis v. Wisconsin precedent chain INSURANCE LINES: Municipal liability, Judicial E&O DISCLAIMER: External validation evidence pack — not legal advice, not filed rate approval.