VELARU MANDATE EXHIBIT PACK — DISABILITY DETERMINATION AI Jurisdiction: France (fr) Modality: Text / Chat Program: Velaru Disability Determination AI · France (galactic_disability_determination_fr) Product ID: disability_determination:fr:bundle:text Vertical: disability_determination Generated: 2026-08-25T16:12:16.947930Z Authority: France CNIL AI Pack — Disability Determination AI External Validation Pack Deadline: EU AI Act + sector regulator Velaru verify: https://velaru-erra.onrender.com/verify EXHIBIT A — AI INVENTORY [] EXHIBIT B — GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK { "framework": "Velaru Mandate Registry \u2014 Disability Determination AI", "exhibit_authority": "France CNIL AI Pack \u2014 Disability Determination AI External Validation Pack", "regulatory_frameworks": [ "APA Section 706", "SSA regulations", "Due Process Clause", "EU AI Act", "CNIL AI recommendations", "GDPR", "French AI Act" ], "standards_alignment": [ "POSS-2", "DRP-1", "TCB", "FRE 707 pre-compliance", "ISO 42001" ], "human_oversight": "execute Disability Determination AI AI decision", "third_party_verification": "https://velaru-erra.onrender.com/verify (operator-independent)", "data_lineage": "Hash-chained Ed25519 receipts; optional RFC3161 + external anchor", "mirror_trap": "Niche Disability Determination AI deployer owns AI harm \u2014 vertical SaaS vendor owns liability cap. \u00b7 CNIL among most aggressive EU DPAs on AI \u2014 French language audit trail required.", "chain_integrity": { "depth": 6, "invariant_holds": true } } EXHIBIT D — DATA INPUTS & VALIDATION { "data_validation_method": "Cryptographic receipt per AI decision; public verify without trusting deployer, vendor, or Velaru operator", "bias_testing_proxy": "Asymmetry score from live chain signals", "model_change_control": "Policy lock registry \u2014 criteria hash frozen pre-dispute", "logging_retention": "90-day pre-dispute window minimum; permanent verify permalinks", "external_validator": "Nisaba LLC / Velaru", "validator_independence": "Client-side Ed25519 verify; BYOK tri-receipt optional", "headline_stat": "Disability Determination AI \u2014 AI decision audit trail required for liability defense", "global_leaders_addressed": [ "Sector regulators", "Vertical SaaS platforms", "CNIL", "Mistral AI", "AMF", "ACPR" ] } MIRROR TRAP (regulatory insight) Niche Disability Determination AI deployer owns AI harm — vertical SaaS vendor owns liability cap. · CNIL among most aggressive EU DPAs on AI — French language audit trail required. NERVE CARDS — WHY GLOBAL LEADERS CARE [ { "title": "Niche litigation", "body": "Disability Determination AI plaintiffs challenge AI decision without independent verify.", "source": "vertical" }, { "title": "Insurance bind", "body": "Sector insurers asking AI governance questions on Disability Determination AI accounts.", "source": "vertical" }, { "title": "[France] Sovereign AI", "body": "France pushing Mistral/sovereign stack \u2014 receipts prove which model decided.", "source": "jurisdiction" }, { "title": "[France] AMF scrutiny", "body": "French financial markets AI \u2014 AMF expects algorithm documentation.", "source": "jurisdiction" }, { "title": "[Text / Chat] Modality hook", "body": "Baseline \u2014 all frameworks apply to text decisions.", "source": "modality" } ] BOOK SUMMARY: { "total_insureds": 0, "compliant": 0, "grace_period": 0, "non_compliant": 0, "expired": 0, "not_enrolled": 0, "compliant_pct": 0.0 } TAM / EXPOSURE: Global Disability Determination AI market INSURANCE LINES: E&O, Cyber, Sector liability DISCLAIMER: External validation evidence pack — not legal advice, not filed rate approval.